Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a] court must read various provisions of a statute consistently and presume that the legislature intended the entire statute to have meaning and effect”
• “If the [Ohio] Supreme Court has not yet addressed the issue presented, [this Court] must predict how it would rule, by looking to ‘all relevant data,’ including state appellate decisions.”
• “If the Ohio Supreme Court has not yet addressed the issue presented, this Court must predict how it would rule, by looking to all relevant data, including state appellate decisions.” (cleaned up)
• “If the Ohio Supreme Court has not yet addressed the issue presented, this Court must predict how it would rule, by looking to all relevant data, including state appellate decisions.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).