Betz v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “hallmark distinction” between civil and criminal contempt “is whether the sanction is coercive or punitive in nature.”
• court’s issuance of a punitive sanction of $250 fine for attorney’s failure to timely file pretrial sentence report order rendered action one for criminal contempt rather than civil contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Naughton v. Bankier
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-02-28· cited 70×
• Dorsey v. Nold
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-01-08· cited 19×
• Fisher v. McCrary Crescent City, LLC
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-08· cited 18×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-13· cited 18×
• Cameron v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-12-29· cited 16×
• SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. v. Harrison
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-11· cited 15×
• Corapcioglu v. Roosevelt
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-20· cited 14×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-13· cited 12×
• Tobin v. Marriott Hotels, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-29· cited 7×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-06· cited 7×
• Kowalczyk v. Bresler
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-12-02· cited 6×
• Station Maintenance Solutions, Inc. v. Two Farms, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-01-24· cited 4×
• Howard County v. Pack Shack, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-04· cited 1×
• (1999)
  Maryland Attorney General Reports· 1999-05-24
• Watson v. Timberlake
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-02