Bettye Williams v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 1 Commissioner, Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no indication that missing portion of transcript would bolster appellant’s arguments, and small gaps in transcript did not “interfere with comprehension of the testimony to an extent that would hinder fair review”
• “Absent an indication that the missing portion of the transcript would bolster appellant’s arguments or prevent judicial review, this Court will not remand a case based upon inaudible portions of the record.”
• “Absent an indication that the missing portion of the transcript would bolster appellant's arguments or prevent judicial review, this Court will not remand a case based upon inaudible portions of the record”
• “Absent an indication that the missing portion of the transcript would bolster appellant’s arguments or prevent judicial review, this Court will not remand a case based upon inaudible portions of the record.”
• “Absent an indication that the missing portion of the transcript would bolster appellant's arguments or prevent judicial review, this Court will not remand a case based upon inaudible portions of the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).