Skip to main content
· 6/5/1987

Betty Martin v. Office of Special Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board

Citations

  • 819 F.2d 1181
  • 260 U.S. App. D.C. 382
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, because witness statements and attorney interview notes were privileged and not routinely discoverable, they were exempt from disclosure under FOIA
  • “allowing] FOIA to be used as a supplement to civil discovery ... undercuts] the exemption’s apparent function ... [and] it also runs afoul of the decisions of the Supreme Court”
  • stating Government must claim valid exemption under both Acts to withhold material
  • to withhold documents from a FOIA/PA request, an agency must show that the documents are exempt from disclosure under each Act
  • “[T]he needs of a particular plaintiff are not relevant to the exemption’s applicability.”
  • work-product privilege does not distinguish between factual and deliberative material; both are protected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Starr, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.