· 2/28/2005
Betty Lou Dossett v. First State Bank, Loomis, Nebraska, Betty Lou Dossett v. Lauritzen Corporation, Doing Business as Financial Services Company
Citations
- 399 F.3d 940
- 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 800
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that adverse judicial rulings almost never constitute a valid basis for recusal
- stating that adverse judicial rulings almost never constitute a valid basis for recusal
- stating that adverse judicial rulings almost never constitute a valid basis for recusal
- stating that adverse judicial rulings almost never constitute a valid basis for recusal
- stating that adverse judicial rulings rarely “constitute a valid basis for recusal”
- applying joint action test for state action to § 1983 action alleging First Amendment violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Riley, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.