Skip to main content
· 2/28/2005

Betty Lou Dossett v. First State Bank, Loomis, Nebraska, Betty Lou Dossett v. Lauritzen Corporation, Doing Business as Financial Services Company

Citations

  • 399 F.3d 940
  • 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 800
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that adverse judicial rulings almost never constitute a valid basis for recusal
  • stating that adverse judicial rulings almost never constitute a valid basis for recusal
  • stating that adverse judicial rulings almost never constitute a valid basis for recusal
  • stating that adverse judicial rulings almost never constitute a valid basis for recusal
  • stating that adverse judicial rulings rarely “constitute a valid basis for recusal”
  • applying joint action test for state action to § 1983 action alleging First Amendment violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Riley, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.