Betty Jo WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INDIANA NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing two ad hoc decisions from.a “permanent exclusion” such as “a denial of tenure”
• discussing the distinction between \the present consequences of a one-time violation and the continuation of the violation into the present\
• “[I]f it obviously would be futile to make a future application for the job of which he has just been turned down, the plaintiff cannot delay suit and use those futile applications to delay the running of the statutory period indefinitely.”
• if the victim cannot by reasonable diligence obtain the information necessary to determine whether he was wrongfully injured and therefore have a claim, the running of the statute of limitations will be suspended until he can obtain the information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).