Betty Gupton v. Commonwealth of Virginia Ray D. Pethel William Bryant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had to show that her impairment foreclosed employment in her field
• holding that plaintiff's allergy to tobacco smoke, while making it impossible to continue in the particular job she had held, did not limit the major life activity of working
• finding no substantial limitation where plaintiff \presented no evidence that her allergy [to tobacco smoke] foreclosed her generally from obtaining jobs in her field\ and where defendant offered her a position in her field in a nearby office
• finding no substantial limitation where plaintiff \pre- sented no evidence that her allergy [to tobacco smoke] fore- closed her generally from obtaining jobs in her field\ and where defendant offered her a position in her field in a nearby office
• plaintiff not foreclosed generally from obtaining jobs in her field when employer offered her another position at different facility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).