Skip to main content
· 9/20/1990

Betty Dockter v. Rudolf Wolff Futures, Inc.

Citations

  • 913 F.2d 456
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16622
  • 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,246
  • 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1642
  • 1990 WL 134986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no quid pro quo sexual harassment where employee was terminated because of inability to become proficient as an operator of IBM personal computer
  • “Dey does not advance a quid pro quo harassment theory, as she admits that no one at Colt linked an economic benefit to her participation in conduct of a sexual nature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Coffey, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.