Skip to main content
· 3/24/1975

Betts v. Weinberger

Citations

  • 391 F. Supp. 1122
  • 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although provision disallowing windfall welfare benefits was deleted, court would read statute in a manner “consistent with the original operation and effect” of the earlier version in order to “conform to the intent of Congress as expressed in the legislative history”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waterman, Holden, Coffrin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.