Skip to main content
· 6/8/1946

Betts v. Easley

Citations

  • 161 Kan. 459
  • 169 P.2d 831
  • 166 A.L.R. 342
  • 1946 Kan. LEXIS 171
  • 18 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2145
  • 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under act usurious contracts are “absolutely void”; hence security given for them is unenforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.