Bettis v. Town of Ontario, NY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting defendants summary judgment on the CWA claim where “the undisputed facts demonstrate the absence of any activity which could constitute an ongoing violation”
• “water itself … is not a pollutant” and “[s]imply moving water from one place to another, therefore, does not constitute the discharge of a pollutant under the” CWA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).