Bettigole v. American Employers Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no reason for confining the terrm corrosion in the context of the policy to a wearing away by ‘natural’ means of weather or the like, or in consequence of conduct of the insured rather than an outsider”
• the court noted that there is no recovery where the excluded event causes the loss, but there is recovery where a covered event causes a loss in the form of an excluded event
• courts distinguish “between an excluded event which causes a loss . . . and a covered event which causes a loss in the form of an excluded event”
• the court noted that there is no recovery where the excluded event causes the loss, but there is recovery where a covered event causes a loss in the form of an excluded event

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).