Bettez v. City of Miami

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court may revisit a ruling denying summary judgment
• treating a “mislabeled” motion for “rehearing under [rule] 1.530” as a motion for “reconsideration” because it was aimed at an interlocutory ruling.
• treating a motion that was “mislabeled” a motion for “rehearing under [rule] 1.530” as a motion for “reconsideration” because it was aimed at an interlocutory ruling (citing Alabama Hotel Co. v. J.L. Mott Iron Works, 86 Fla. 608, 98 So. 825 (1924))
• mo-tion, which was in substance a motion for reconsideration, treated as such despite being mislabeled as a motion for rehearing
• \It is well settled in this state that a trial court has inherent authority to reconsider ... any of its interlocutory rulings prior to entry of a final judgment or final order in the cause.\
• \It is well settled in this state that a trial court has inherent authority to reconsider ... any of its interlocutory rulings prior to entry of a final judgment or final order in the cause.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).