Skip to main content
· 2/3/2003

Betsy L. Nichols, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Muskingum College, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 318 F.3d 674
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1754
  • 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, on a factual attack, a district court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to determine if jurisdiction exists (quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • on a factual attack, a district court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to determine if jurisdiction exists
  • “[T]he court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to resolve factual disputes concerning jurisdiction, and both parties are free to supplement the record by affidavits.”
  • “[T]he court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to resolve factual disputes concerning jurisdiction, and both parties are free to supplement the record by affidavits.”
  • In deciding a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss, \the court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to resolve factual disputes concerning jurisdiction.\
  • “[T]he court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to resolve factual disputes concerning jurisdiction, and both parties are free to supplement the record by affidavits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Moore, Wiseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.