· 2/3/2003
Betsy L. Nichols, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Muskingum College, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
Citations
- 318 F.3d 674
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1754
- 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, on a factual attack, a district court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to determine if jurisdiction exists (quotation marks and citation omitted)
- on a factual attack, a district court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to determine if jurisdiction exists
- “[T]he court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to resolve factual disputes concerning jurisdiction, and both parties are free to supplement the record by affidavits.”
- “[T]he court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to resolve factual disputes concerning jurisdiction, and both parties are free to supplement the record by affidavits.”
- In deciding a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss, \the court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to resolve factual disputes concerning jurisdiction.\
- “[T]he court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to resolve factual disputes concerning jurisdiction, and both parties are free to supplement the record by affidavits.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin, Moore, Wiseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.