Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Betlach v. Planned Parenthood Ariz., Inc.

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1283
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 300
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3491
  • 571 U.S. 1198
  • 2014 WL 684081
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an “FHA claim can proceed under either a disparate- treatment or a disparate-impact theory of liability”
  • setting forth the differing standards between a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment
  • finding plaintiff had made a prima facie case for a disparate impact claim under the FHA
  • setting forth the differing standards between a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment
  • describing the “three-step, burden-shifting framework” for analyzing FHA disparate impact claims
  • explaining the three-step burden shifting framework for disparate-impact claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.