· 2/24/2014
Betlach v. Planned Parenthood Ariz., Inc.
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 1283
- 188 L. Ed. 2d 300
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3491
- 571 U.S. 1198
- 2014 WL 684081
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1504
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an “FHA claim can proceed under either a disparate- treatment or a disparate-impact theory of liability”
- setting forth the differing standards between a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment
- finding plaintiff had made a prima facie case for a disparate impact claim under the FHA
- setting forth the differing standards between a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment
- describing the “three-step, burden-shifting framework” for analyzing FHA disparate impact claims
- explaining the three-step burden shifting framework for disparate-impact claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.