Bethune v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The State is not required... to prove all the predicate offenses alleged in the indictment, hut is required to prove only two beyond a reasonable doubt.”
• Where the defendants were formerly prosecuted and sentenced for certain criminal offenses, the State could not later prosecute the defendants for racketeering predicated on that same criminal conduct.
• “The State is not required . . . to prove all the predicate offenses alleged in the indictment, but is required to prove only two beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dorsey v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-06-30· cited 38×
• Overton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-11-26· cited 22×
• Interagency, Inc. v. Danco Financial Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-03-18· cited 13×
• Mosley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-02-13· cited 11×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-02-01· cited 8×
• Lam v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-03-17· cited 5×
• Hicks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-03· cited 5×
• CARR v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-06-14· cited 4×
• Redford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-04-01· cited 1×
• Darryl Hicks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-03

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hamilton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1977-05-12· cited 179×
• Kirkland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1977-03-07· cited 42×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-11-15· cited 26×
• Sanders v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-09-22· cited 9×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-03-17· cited 7×