Skip to main content
· 3/19/2003

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. BP Energy Co. (In Re Bethlehem Steel Corp.)

Citations

  • 291 B.R. 260
  • 50 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 465
  • 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 310
  • 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 35
  • 2003 WL 1873432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The presumption is favor of the contract price is viable unless the [party challenging that rate] introduces convincing evidence to the contrary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burton R. Lifland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.