· 3/19/2003
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. BP Energy Co. (In Re Bethlehem Steel Corp.)
Citations
- 291 B.R. 260
- 50 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 465
- 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 310
- 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 35
- 2003 WL 1873432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The presumption is favor of the contract price is viable unless the [party challenging that rate] introduces convincing evidence to the contrary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burton R. Lifland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.