Skip to main content
· 10/29/1999

Bethel v. Thorn

Citations

  • 757 So. 2d 1154
  • 1999 WL 985149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing trial court’s dismissal of suppression claim and finding that the circumstances, including defendants’ repeated representations that they could timely deliver goods under contract, which was “of critical importance,” gave rise to a duty to disclose
  • alleging promissory fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, and fraudulent suppression
  • listing the elements of promissory fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: See

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.