Bethel v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating insurance policies are to be constructed in favor of the insured and insurance coverage
• “When an insurer fails to define a term in a policy, the insurer cannot take the position that there should be a narrow, restrictive interpretation of the coverage provided.”
• “When an insurer fails to define a term in a policy, the insurer cannot take the position that there should be narrow, restrictive interpretation of the coverage provided.”
• \The scope and extent of insurance coverage is determined by the plain language and terms of the policy.\ (citing Roberts v. Fla. Lawyers Mut. Ins. Co., 839 So. 2d 843, 845 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003))
• “When an insurer fails to define a term in the policy, the insurer cannot take the position that there should be a narrow, restrictive interpretation of the coverage provided.” (citing State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. CTC Dev. Corp., 720 So. 2d 1072, 1076 (Fla. 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).