Bethea v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the government’s inquiry into an apparently erroneous figure in the successful offeror’s proposal was “a quintessential example of a clarification”
• explaining that “some past performance information” is “too close at hand” to exclude 19 from consideration
• observing that “some [past performance] information is simply too close at hand to require offerors to shoulder the inequities that spring from an agency’s failure to obtain and consider the information”
• “A plaintiff that cannot show that it will actually succeed on the merits of its claim cannot prevail on its motion for injunctive relief.”
• “A plaintiff that cannot show that it will actually succeed on the merits of its claim cannot prevail on its motion for injunctive relief.”
• “A plaintiff that cannot show that it will actually succeed on the merits of its claim cannot prevail on its motion for injunctive relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).