Skip to main content
· 10/4/1985

Bethea v. Smith

Citations

  • 336 S.E.2d 295
  • 176 Ga. App. 467
  • 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing non-physician's overlapping expertise with medical doctor on specific standard of medical care
  • discussing non-physician’s overlapping expertise with medical doctor on specific standard of medical care
  • affidavit of podiatrist in medical malpractice action against orthopedic surgeon that he was familiar with the medical profession generally was insufficient where there was no showing of overlapping expertise
  • familiarity with standard of care and treatment of another profession not enough
  • affidavit of podiatrist in action against orthopedic surgeon that he was familiar with the medical profession generally was insufficient where there was no showing that method of treatment was the same for the two professions
  • affidavit by podiatrist against orthopedic surgeon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Birdsong, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.