Beth Israel Hospital Ass'n v. Board of Registration in Medicine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “reading the exception to the [medical peer review] privilege narrowly is consistent with our cases where we have refused to add to the listed exceptions to a given statutory privilege”
• “regulation may be authorized though not traceable to specific statutory language, [and] powers granted include those reasonably implied”
• the peer review privilege is “designed to foster aggressive critiquing of medical care by the provider’s peers”
• “regulation may be authorized though not traceable to specific statutory language, [and] powers granted include those reasonably implied”
• “[A]gencies have leeway in interpreting statutes they enforce, and . . . specific statutory authority does not bar consistent action under general authority”
• “all presumptions are in favor of the validity of agency action . . . [and] agencies have leeway in interpreting statutes they enforce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).