Skip to main content
· 11/12/2013

Beth Cosey v. The Prudential Insurance Company

Citations

  • 735 F.3d 161
  • 56 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2997
  • 2013 WL 5977151
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 22833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the relevant plans did not contain a requirement that Cosey submit objective proof, the district court erred in its determination that Prudential could deny Cosey’s claims on the basis that her proof lacked an objective component

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Keenan, Floyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.