· 11/12/2013
Beth Cosey v. The Prudential Insurance Company
Citations
- 735 F.3d 161
- 56 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2997
- 2013 WL 5977151
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 22833
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because the relevant plans did not contain a requirement that Cosey submit objective proof, the district court erred in its determination that Prudential could deny Cosey’s claims on the basis that her proof lacked an objective component
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Keenan, Floyd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.