Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claimant may still be entitled to benefits if a compensable injury prevented him from acquiring employment within his abilities at his previous wage
• holding failure to rule “on a fully tried issue” will be considered a denial of claim for jurisdictional reasons
• holding where JCC fails to rule on fully tried issue ripe for adjudication and does not reserve jurisdiction, absence of ruling constitutes reversible error
• explaining that the court will “consider the JCC’s failure to rule reversible error based on the JCC’s noncompliance with the duty to adjudicate all issues that are ripe for adjudication”
• stating where JCC reserves ruling on a claim that is ripe for adjudication, order is not yet final or appealable
• stating where the JCC reserves ruling on claim that is ripe for adjudication, order is not yet final or appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).