Betancourt v. Federated Department Stores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that the disabled person is being deterred from visiting an establishment they would otherwise visit, even if infrequently, is an ongoing, present injury.”
• “Thus, any disabled plaintiff who alleges an intent to return can demonstrate a non-speculative injury sufficient for injunctive relief under the ADA.”
• “The fact that the disabled person is being deterred from visiting an establishment they would otherwise visit, even if infrequently, is an ongoing, present injury.”
• “A disabled tester who experiences the discrimination prohibited by the ADA has standing to seek relief.”
• “allegation that plaintiff would return to the public accommodation ‘soon’ was sufficient”
• providing detailed, multi-faceted analysis of support for “deterrent effect” approach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).