Best v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the conflict-of-laws issue was presented in underinsured-motorist-coverage case, and, without reference to South Carolina's conflicts law, holding that Alabama substantive law did not apply
• law of South Carolina applied on UM-coverage question under a policy issued there where a resident of that state filed a UM claim in Alabama concerning a vehicle principally garaged in South Carolina

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).