Skip to main content
· 1/13/1981

Best Concrete Products Co. v. Medusa Corp.

Citations

  • 276 S.E.2d 147
  • 157 Ga. App. 97
  • 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the trial court had already dismissed Best’s claim of discriminatory pricing as preempted by federal law, discovery from Medusa as to its dealings with other customers was properly refused as irrelevant
  • holding that where the trial court had already dismissed Best’s claim of discriminatory pricing as preempted by federal law, discovery from Medusa as to its dealings with other customers was properly refused as irrelevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsong, Deen, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.