Skip to main content
· 10/4/1904

Bessette v. W. B. Conket Co.

Citations

  • 133 F. 165
  • 66 C.C.A. 291
  • 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs met their conditional certification burden for employees who were not paid for driving to and from the worksite
  • explaining the relevant exemptions regarding truck drivers operating vehicles weighing more than 10,000 pounds
  • “[I]t would be inappropriate to deny conditional ‘certification’ now” because overtime determinations will require individualized assessments
  • “Plaintiffs must show three things: (1) an employer policy, (2) that affected the Plaintiffs in a particular way, and (3) that also affected other employees in a similar way.”
  • “[C]ourt costs lan- guage will not be included in the Opt–In Consent Form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grosscup, Jenkins, Seaman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.