· 8/12/1977
Bess v. Bothman
Citations
- 257 N.W.2d 791
- 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that under the “blue pencil” doctrine, courts modify unreasonable restraints of trade and ʺenforce them to the extent reasonable in the circumstancesʺ
- holding the “enforcement of restrictive covenants remains a matter of equitable discretion” and the district court has the “authority to modify and enforce [a] covenant not to compete”
- time limitation should represent a reasonable balance between protection of plaintiffs goodwill and avoidance of undue hardship to defendant
- \The rationale of the blue pencil doctrine is that a court is merely enforcing the legal parts of a divisible contract rather than making a new contract for the parties.\
- “The rationale of the blue pencil doctrine is that a court is merely enforcing the legal parts of a divisible contract rather than making a new contract for the parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Rogosheske, Todd, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.