Skip to main content
· 9/17/1982

Bess Kennedy v. William H. Whitehurst, Acting Director, Department of Human Services

Citations

  • 690 F.2d 951
  • 223 U.S. App. D.C. 228
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25555
  • 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,044
  • 29 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comparing the availability of attorney’s fees under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and under Title VII
  • attorneys’ fees not authorized for work in administrative proceedings under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act which refers only to an action
  • “determination of appropriate remedies must be informed by the ADEA as a whole.”
  • provisions of § 626 (d) are “subject to waiver, estoppel and equitable tolling”
  • in ADEA context “exhaustion requirement is not jurisdictional in nature but rather [is] a statutory condition precedent to the instigation of litigation and [is] therefore subject to waiver, estoppel, and equitable tolling.”
  • “[T]he timeliness and exhaustion requirements [of ADEA] are not jurisdictional in nature but rather are statutory conditions precedent to the instigation of litigation and are therefore subject to waiver, estoppel, and equitable tolling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamm, Robb, Markey, Patent

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.