Bertrand Ex Rel. Bertrand v. Maram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it “is essential to prevent defendants from buying off all potential class representatives by meeting their demands, one at a time, and thus preventing effectual relief to a larger class of victims”
• making assumption because it was made in earlier case and where issue not adequately briefed
• assuming a right of action exists and deciding the case on the merits because “[a] private right of action is not a component of subject- matter jurisdiction”
• “This circuit has itself assumed after Gonzaga University that § 1396a(a)(8) may be enforced via § 1983.”
• “A private right of action is not a component of subject-matter jurisdiction.”
• “A private right of action is not a component of subject-matter jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).