Skip to main content
· 1/19/1965

Bertram v. Wunning

Citations

  • 385 S.W.2d 803
  • 1965 Mo. App. LEXIS 724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding expert testimony that the accident “could be” the cause of the plaintiff’s injury, was not, standing alone, substantial evidence of a causal connection between the injury and the accident required for submission of issue of causation to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doerner, Ruddy, Anderson, Connett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.