Skip to main content
· 7/15/1993

Bertha Paglin Ferman, Etc. v. United States

Citations

  • 993 F.2d 485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Outside of the tax context, the Court has held that the retroactive application of a statute must be ‘arbitrary and irrational’ to violate due process. See Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1, 15, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2892, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Garza, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.