Bert O. Jonsson, Besam Ab and Besam, Inc. v. The Stanley Works, the Stanley Works v. Besam, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing \arguments and remarks\ offered during prosecution of the parent patent to distinguish it from the prior art
• affirming claim construction relying on “arguments and remarks” made 5 during the prosecution of a parent application for the same claim term
• affirming claim construction relying on \arguments and remarks\ made during the prosecution of a parent application for claim terms in a patent resulting from a continuation-in-part application despite recognizing the claims used different language
• acknowledging it was \not disputed\ that the two patents contained similar limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).