Berson v. Ewing
Citations
- 84 Cal. 89
- 3 Cal. Unrep. 260
- 23 P. 1112
- 1890 Cal. LEXIS 764
Syllabus
<p>Malicious Prosecution of Civil Action — Attachment — Statute of Limitations. — The statute of limitations does not begin to run against a claim for damages for the malicious prosecution of a civil action upon an unfounded claim until the action is terminated, although an attachment may have issued in the action.</p> <p>Id. — Malicious Attachment — Running of Limitation. — It is only where an illegal and malicious attachment is the gist of the action that limitation runs from the date of its issuance and levy; and this rule does not apply where the gist of the action is the malicious prosecution of an unfounded claim in which, so far as the record is concerned, a writ of attachment might have properly issued.</p> <p>Partnership — Rights of Surviving Partner — Claim for Unliquidated Damages — Settlement of Partnership. — A surviving partner has power, under section 2461 of the Civil Code, to prosecute a claim for unliquidated damages in favor of the partnership; and under section 1585 of the same code, has power to settle the business of the partnership, which includes everything that may be necessary to wind up its affairs.</p> <p>Id.—Construction of Code—“Debts” and “Claims” — Damages.— Though the word “debt” does not, in its legal sense, like the word “ claim,” include a demand for damages arising from a tort, they are used synonymously in section 2461 of the Civil Code.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that armed robbery and aggravated assault merge when the crimes are part of the same act or transaction because there is no additional element in the crime of aggravated assault
- noting that “the failure to make a meritless objection cannot amount to ineffective assistance”
- armed robbery and aggravated assault arose out of same act or transaction where defendant pointed gun at victim and immediately thereafter took money from a cigar box
- armed robbery and aggravated assault arose out of same act or transaction where defendant pointed gun at victim and immediately thereafter took money from a cigar box
- since aggravated assault with a deadly weapon does not require proof of any element that armed robbery does not, convictions for both offenses will merge if the crimes are part of the same act or transaction
- since aggravated assault with a deadly weapon does not require proof of any element that armed robbery does not, convictions for both offenses will merge if the crimes are part of the same act or transaction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.