Berschback v. Grosse Pointe Public School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the adoption and application of athletic eligibility rules by the MHSAA constitute state action for purposes of application of the constitutional right to equal protection of the laws
• MHSAA eligibility rules involve state action for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment
• “The deeision[ ] in ... Sturrup appear[s] to be [an] anomalfy] in this area of the law. [T]he focus on the ‘overbroad’ and ‘overinclusive’ nature of the rules ... to find a denial of equal protection departs significantly from traditional equal protection analysis.”
• \The decision[ ] in . . . Sturrup appear[s] to be [an] anomal[y] in this area of the law. [T]he focus on the `overbroad' and `overinclusive' nature of the rules . . . to find a denial of equal protection departs significantly from traditional equal protection analysis.\
• “The decision[ ] in . . . Sturrup appear[s] to be [an] anomal[y] in this area of the law. [T]he focus on the ‘overbroad’ and ‘overinclusive’ nature of the rules . . . to find a denial of equal protection departs significantly from traditional equal protection analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).