Bersani v. GEN. ACC. FIRE CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that an insurance policy that violated New York Insurance Law was illegal and \against public policy\ and, citing § 3103's predecessor, holding that such a policy was \valid and binding on [the insurer]\
• “purported agreement that the insureds would not pursue a claim which would arise under the policy, standing alone, or engrafted upon the terms of the standard policy, was and is against public policy” and hence void
• agreements that violate public policy are unenforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).