Berryhill v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding claims of fraud in sentencing court and on direct appeal necessarily attacked the state court judgment and were second or successive
• construing the petitioner’s 60(b) motion as a second or successive motion because he alleged fraud committed in his sentencing and direct appeal courts, not fraud on the habeas court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Douglas v. Workman
  Tenth Circuit· 2009-03-26· cited 148×
• United States v. Springer
  Tenth Circuit· 2017-11-13· cited 46×
• Clark v. Milyard
  Tenth Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 3×
• United States v. Baker
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-05-21
• United States v. Baker
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-05-06
• Cleveland v. Havanek
  Tenth Circuit· 2014-06-03
• Heckard v. Tafoya
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-01-30

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gonzalez v. Crosby
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 3,107×
• Spitznas v. Boone
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-09-29· cited 409×
• Edwin L. Moore v. Captain Schoeman Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
  Tenth Circuit· 2002-04-29· cited 113×
• Anthony Jerome Harris v. Ron Champion, Warden Susan Brimmer Loving , Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma
  Tenth Circuit· 1991-07-19· cited 77×
• Harris v. Champion
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-02-21· cited 33×
• United States v. Gallegos
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-04-23· cited 22×
• Lavern Berryhill v. Edward Evans
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-02-11· cited 1×

Other cases named Berryhill v. Evans

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Berryhill v. Evans
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-02-11
• Berryhill v. Evans
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-10-25
• Berryhill v. Evans
  Supreme Court· 2010-11-29
• Berryhill v. Evans
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-10
• Berryhill v. Evans
  Supreme Court· 2010-11-29