Skip to main content
· 3/15/1886

Berry v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Citations

  • 48 N.J.L. 141
  • 4 A. 303
  • 1886 N.J. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “inconsistent provisions of the prior statute . . . are treated as repealed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.