Skip to main content
· 10/21/2013

Berry v. Palmer

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 485
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 328
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3234
  • 571 U.S. 979
  • 2013 WL 5212495
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding bankruptcy courts generally apply forum state choice-of-law rules for issues of state law
  • applying New York choice-of-law principles to conclude that the applicable state substantive law is where the injury was inflicted and not where the fraudulent act originated
  • discussing policy arguments against treating hourly fee matters as partnership property including (1) the nature of the attorney-client relationship, (2) economic consequences and perverse incentives, (3) rules of professional conduct, 11 and (4
  • on a motion to dismiss, the court must \accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true and draw all reasonable inferences in plaintiff's favor\
  • “Matters judicially noticed by the District Court are not considered matters outside the pleadings.” (quoting Staehr v. Hartford Fin. Servs. Grp., Inc., 547 F.3d 406, 426 (2d Cir. 2008))
  • “Where state law is unsettled, [the Court is] obligated to carefully predict how the state’s highest court would resolve the uncertainty or ambiguity.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.