Skip to main content

Berry v. McLeod

Citations

  • 604 P.2d 610
  • 124 Ariz. 346
  • 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • imposing a duty to disclose to parties to the escrow when a title company has knowledge that a fraud is being committed
  • escrow agent has fiduciary duty to disclose known fraud committed on a party to an escrow
  • no waiver of right to new trial where verdicts were hopelessly inconsistent and resubmission would have been futile
  • where counsel’s statements to trial court suggested “consent” to not resubmitting verdicts to jury, party could not claim court erred in not sending verdicts back under Rule 49(c)
  • “The escrow company is not a guardian for the uninitiated.”
  • “[A]n escrow agent has no duty to look for fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.