Berry v. Crouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “when two writings are inconsistent, the contract last executed, if valid, will supersede the first to the extent that the two are inconsistent. [ . . .] The subsequent agreement, even though it is in writing, does not discharge the previous oral (or written

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).