Skip to main content
· 7/17/2007

Berry v. Budget Rent a Car Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 497 F. Supp. 2d 1361
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51492
  • 2007 WL 2050994

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting motion to dismiss FDUTPA claim because the challenged language was not deceptive
  • tracing the origin of unjust-enrichment claims to common-law actions of assumpsit
  • the title “cost-recovery fee” implies that the company will keep the money collected as a “recovery for costs”
  • the title “cost-recovery fee” implies that the company will keep the money collected as a “recovery for costs”
  • “[A] quasi-contractual claim fails upon a showing that an express contract exist[s].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.