· 9/22/2010
Berry v. Astrue
Citations
- 622 F.3d 1228
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19659
- 2010 WL 3665151
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a decision of another agency' is ordinarily entitled to great weight when that agency’s disability program bears a “marked similarity” to the Social Security disability program
- stating that an ALJ may not “discredit the claimant’s testimony as to subjective symptoms merely because they are unsupported by objective evidence”
- finding that the ALJ’s conclusion 9 that the claimant’s pain was not completely disabling because it was adequately 10 controlled with medications was valid and supported by the record
- “General findings are insufficient; rather, the 12 ALJ must identify what testimony is not credible and what evidence undermines the claimant's 13 complaints.”
- ALJ properly discounted VA disability rating where evidence that post-dated the disability rating demonstrated improvement
- an ALJ may give less weight to the VA’s decision if the ALJ provides “persuasive, specific, valid reasons for doing so that are supported by the record.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tashima, Fisher, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.