Skip to main content
· 1/30/2015

Berry Law PLLC v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 414 U.S. App. D.C. 138
  • 777 F.3d 505
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1488
  • 2015 WL 394094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding there was no reasonable expectation of payment where the defendant clearly communicated that the work in question was preliminary and would not be compensated
  • “No compensation is due where the ‘plaintiff did not contemplate a personal fee, or the defendant could not reasonably have supposed that he did.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffith, Pillard, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.