· 1/30/2015
Berry Law PLLC v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.
Citations
- 414 U.S. App. D.C. 138
- 777 F.3d 505
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 1488
- 2015 WL 394094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding there was no reasonable expectation of payment where the defendant clearly communicated that the work in question was preliminary and would not be compensated
- “No compensation is due where the ‘plaintiff did not contemplate a personal fee, or the defendant could not reasonably have supposed that he did.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Griffith, Pillard, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.