Berry Gordy v. The Daily News, L.P. George Rush Tony Turner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that specific jurisdiction existed in light of evidence of \targeting\ of the plaintiff, who was a forum resident
• noting that 13 subscriptions, “even though few, is not random or fortuitous ....”
• distinguishing certain cases holding that no personal jurisdiction existed under Calder on the ground that in those cases targeting was lacking
• distinguishing certain cases holding that no personal jurisdiction existed under Calder on the ground that in those cases targeting was lacking
• finding personal jurisdiction proper in California defamation action against New York newspaper because 13 to 18 California residents subscribed to the paper
• finding personal jurisdiction where “[t]he prime targeting [arose] ... from the fact that [plaintiff was] an individual who live[d] in California”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).