Skip to main content
· 6/22/1994

Berro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 645 A.2d 342
  • 165 Pa. Commw. 298
  • 1994 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “but-for” driving to his physical therapist for treatment of his work-related injury, claimant would not have been in the car accident that caused additional injuries, and therefore the additional injuries were compensable
  • finding that \but-for\ driving to his physical therapist for treatment of his work-related injury, claimant would not have been in the car accident that caused additional injuries, and therefore the additional injuries were compensable
  • finding that “but for” driving to see his physical therapist for treatment of his work-related injury, claimant would not have been in the car accident that caused additional injuries, and therefore the additional injuries were compensable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGinley, Kelley, Kelton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.