Bernuth v. Zoning Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a \court will not search the record for supporting evidence or decide for itself what is proper in the circumstances\
• holding findings of fact necessary so that Board decisions \may be susceptible of judicial review\
• holding findings of fact necessary so that Board decisions \may be susceptible of judicial review\
• holding findings of fact necessary so that Board decisions \may be susceptible of judicial review\
• remarking that a factfinder “is required to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of its decisions in order that such decisions may be susceptible of judicial review”
• finding that applicants seeking a dimensional variance have the burden before the zoning board of showing that a factual basis appears in the record to support their propositions for dimensional relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).