Skip to main content
· 9/8/1986

Bernstein v. Centaur Insurance

Citations

  • 644 F. Supp. 1361
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding absence of dual agency because there existed virtually no “evidence that [the principal’s agent] acted as an agent for [the third party]”
  • plaintiffs could not reasonably rely on apparent authority of vice president of one of defendant's subsidiaries to bind defendant, when plaintiffs had actual notice that the vice president was no longer employed by the subsidiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cannella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.