Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a pro se plaintiff failed to formally introduce certain evidence to the court, he could not claim error based on said evidence on appeal
• noting that, although the estimated number of putative class members is a relevant consideration, “numbers alone are not usually determinative” of numerosity
• noting that, although the estimated number of putative class members is a relevant consideration, “numbers alone are not usually determinative” of numerosity
• affirming that plaintiff was “an inadequate representative of [a] broad class” in part because plaintiff “would have difficulty establishing proof” of the class injuries
• upholding denial of motion to amend com- plaint after commencement of trial, where complaint had been filed seven years earlier
• upholding denial of motion to amend complaint after commencement of trial, where complaint had been filed seven years earlier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).